Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 31;13(17):4406. doi: 10.3390/cancers13174406

Table 2.

Studies of metabolites analyzed in pre-diagnostic blood samples (collected in prospective cohort or general screening settings) for the purpose of risk prediction or early diagnosis of colorectal cancer.

Reference Cohort
(Design)
Time from Sampling to Diagnosis
(Cohort Setting Only)
CRC Adenoma Contr./
Cohort
Biomarker/
Platform
Main Findings Adapted NOS Scale **

Max:
Selection = ★★★★
Comp. = ★★
Exp./Outc. = ★★★
Cohort setting
Kühn et al.
BMC Med, 2016 [56]
EPIC-HEIDELBERG
(Case-cohort)
6.6 years (median) 163 - 774 120 metabolites: (acylcarnitines, amino acids, biogenic amines, phosphatidylcholines, sphingolipids, and hexoses) Top markers: LysoPC a C18:0, PC ae C30:0
LysoPC a C18:0 (4th vs. 1st quartile)
OR: 1.84 (95% CI: 1.02–3.34)
PC ae C30:0 (4th vs. 1st quartile)
OR: 0.50 (95% CI: 0.28–0.90)
★★★
★★
★★★
Shu et al.
Int J Cancer, 2018 [58]
SWHS/SMHS (Nested case control) Time stratification:
<4 years and >4 years
250 - 250 * Metabolites in plasma:
35 metabolites associated with CRC at FDR-p < 0.05
Top 9 panel: AUC: 0.76
Top 2 single metabolites:
Picolinic acid: OR: 5.11 (95% CI: 2.33–11.20)
PE(20:0/18:2): OR: 0.45 (95% CI: 0.29–0.70)
★★★★
★★
★★★
Cross et al.
Cancer, 2014 [55]
PLCO (Nested case control) 7.8 years (median) 254 - 254 * 676 serum metabolites (metabolon) Leucyl-leucine (90th vs. 10th percentile)OR: 0.50 (95% CI: 0.32–0.80)
Glycochenodeoxycholate (90th vs. 10th percentile, sex stratified)
OR: 5.34 (95% CI: 2.09–13.68)
Significance lost after adjustments
★★★★
★★
★★★
Perttula et al.
BMC Cancer, 2018 [57]
EPIC-TURIN (Nested case control) 7.5 years (median) 66 - 66 * Lipophilic metabolites incl. (ULCFAs):
8690 features, 9 selected
Top markers: IDs: 5080, 3207, 6054 and 839 Classification rate: 72% ★★
★★
★★★
Screening setting
Farshidfar F et al.
Br J Cancer, 2016 [59]
Screening
patients,
Calgary,
Canada
(discovery)
- - A: 31 254 GC-MS untargeted metabolomics Multi-marker profile: (14 metabolites): AUC 0.81 (0.70–0.92) ★★★
★★
★★★

Abbreviations (not including biomarker names, for which the reader is referred to the original study article): CI, confidence interval, CRC, colorectal cancer; EPIC, European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition; GC-MS, gas chromatography–mass spectrometry; OR, odds ratio; PLCO, Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian cancer screening trial; SMHS, Shanghai Men’s Health Study; SWHS, Shanghai Women’s Health Study. * Matched controls. ** Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for case-control studies, adapted for use for assessment of biomarker studies conducted in a screening setting. For case-control studies: selection (max 4 stars), comparability (max 2 stars), exposure (max 3 stars). For cohort studies: selection (max 4 stars), comparability (max 2 stars), outcome (max 3 stars).