Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 25;60(35):12999–13012. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.1c01742

Table 2. Calculated NICS(1) Values (ppm) for the Respective Linker Fragments and Calculated Binding Energies (kJ/mol) of the COF–Gas Pairs with Respect to the Positions of the Gases along with the Qst (kJ/mol) of COF–Gas Pairs Obtained from GCMC Simulationsa.

      CH4
C2H6
N2
H2
  fragment NICS(1) Ebind Qst Ebind Qst Ebind Qst Ebind Qst
COF-303 P1 –8.82 –5.30 –12.14 –11.10 –19.54 –5.63 –9.12 –0.06 –3.39
P2 –9.19 –10.38 –15.99 –9.39 –0.62
COF-300 P1 –8.83 –5.50 –11.56 –12.03 –18.46 –4.44 –8.59 0.55 –3.27
P2 –8.94 –12.07 –21.05 –9.85 –0.72
PZ-COF2 P1 –11.02 –7.12 –14.22 –9.82 –23.52 –5.23 –11.03 0.45 –3.52
P2 0.40 –7.66 –14.99 –5.83 –0.20
P3 –9.11 –6.23 –14.99 –5.68 0.37
a

Negative signs of binding energies imply attractive interaction.