Table 2. Databases of Crystalline Porous Materials.

index	database	number of entries	origin	cleaned	optimized	charges included
1	Wilmer-et-al.(100)	137 953	simulation	yes	no	no
2	Boyd-and-Woo(157)	324 426	simulation	yes	yes	yes
3	ToBaCCo(152,160)	13 512	simulation	yes	yes	no
4	CSD150	>1M	experiment	no	no	no
5	Goldsmith et al.161	4000	experiment	yes	no	no
6	CoRE-MOF-2019(165)	∼14 000	experiment	yes	partiallya	partiallyb
7	CSD-MOF-subsetc(154)	96 000	experiment	yes	no	no
8	hZeo112,166	2.6M	simulation	yes	yes	no
9	IZA(111)	253	experiment	yes	yes	no
10	hPPN(153)	18 000	simulation	yes	yes	no
11	hCOF(167)	69 840	simulation	yes	yes	no
12	CoRE-COF(168)	449	experiment	yes	yes	yes
13	CURATED-COFs(171)	482	experiment	yes	yes	yes
14	hZIFs86		simulation
15	NE-DB(2)	530 243	simulation and experiment
16	NMG149,173	>3M	simulation and experiment
17	PRAM-DB(175)	205	simulation and experiment			partially

^a879 MOFs underwent geometry optimization and were released as part of CoRE MOF-DFT optimized 2017.¹⁶⁴

^bPartial atomic charges of 2932 MOFs were computed and were released as part of CoRE MOF-DDEC 2016.¹⁶³

^cAs of Aug 2019.^132,154