Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 31;13(17):4410. doi: 10.3390/cancers13174410

Table 1.

Inter-observer agreement between pathologists scoring sTILs in circulation 1 and 2.

sTILs Circulation 1 a (n = 23) Circulation 1 a (n = 14) Circulation 2 (n = 14)
(%) ICC 95% CI p Value ICC 95% CI p Value ICC 95% CI p Value b
Absolute values
0.634 0.539–0.735 <0.001 0.662 0.566–0.760 <0.001 0.798 0.727–0.864 <0.001
Cutpoints
≥10
≥20
0.368
0.484
0.278–0.488
0.385–0.603
<0.001
<0.001
0.426
0.492
0.324–0.551
0.388–0.614
<0.001
<0.001
0.486
0.657
0.382–0.608
0.561–0.756
<0.001
<0.001
≥25 0.573 0.475–0.684 <0.001 0.602 0.501–0.711 <0.001 0.596 0.495–0.706 <0.001
≥30 0.537 0.438–0.652 <0.001 0.555 0.451–0.671 <0.001 0.597 0.495–0.706 <0.001
≥40 0.488 0.389–0.606 <0.001 0.506 0.401–0.626 <0.001 0.644 0.546–0.745 <0.001
≥50 0.428 0.332–0.549 <0.001 0.440 0.337–0.564 <0.001 0.569 0.465–0.682 <0.001
≥60 0.351 0.263–0.470 <0.001 0.368 0.271–0.493 <0.001 0.479 0.375–0.602 <0.001

a For circulation 1, inter-observer agreement is given for all 23 pathologists and separately for the 14 pathologists who undertook circulation 2. b A statistically significant value for the absolute values and cutpoints supports the interpretation that there is sufficient evidence in the sample to conclude that the relationships exist in the population. CI, confidence interval; ICC, intra-class correlation coefficient.