Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 6;22(17):9641. doi: 10.3390/ijms22179641

Table 4.

Human studies of the gut microbiota in T2D.

Reference Authors Year of Study Subjects Number Study Findings (Microbiota Changes in T2D vs. Control)
[89] Li et al. 2020 20 T2D patients vs. 40 healthy individuals from North China
  • Decreased gut microbe diversity.

  • T2D had reduced levels of Butyrate-producing bacteria (Bifidobacterium, Akkermansia, Faecalibacterium) and increased levels of bacteria involved in chronic inflammation (Dorea).

  • Abundance in Dorea’s levels could identify patients at high risk for T2D.

[90] Chávez-Carbajal et al. 2020 217 pre-diabetic and diabetic patients with and without treatment vs. healthy individuals (Mexican subjects)
  • Reduced bacterial richness and diversity.

  • Pre-diabetic and diabetic groups had specific predicted metabolic characteristics and gut bacteria.

[91] Doumatey et al. 2020 98 T2D Nigerians vs.
193 healthy Nigerians
  • Increased Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes phyla.

  • Decreased Firmicutes phylum.

  • Clostridiaceae and Peptostreptococcaceaea

  • families were significantly reduced.

[92] Sedighi et al. 2017 18 T2D vs. 18 healthy
  • Bifidobacterium genus was reduced while Lactobacillus was significantly increased.

[93] Inoue et al. 2017 12 T2D vs. 10 healthy (Japanese population)
  • 11 pathways were significantly enriched in the diabetic group, including insulin signaling, glycolysis, and glycogenesis pathways.

  • Significant reduction in Blautia genus, negatively correlated with HbA1c and glucose levels.

[94] Wu et al. 2010 16 T2D vs. 12 healthy
  • Reduction in species profiles and reduced levels of Bifidobacterium genus and Bacteroides vulgatus.

[95] Larsen et al. 2010 18 T2D vs. 18 healthy
  • Bacteroidetes: Firmicutes ratio and Bacteroides-Prevotella to Blautia coccoides -Eubacterium rectal correlated positively with plasma glucose levels.

[96] Bilen et al. 2007 66 T2D vs. 50 healthy
  • Conjunctival flora from patients with T2D had increased Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis compared to control.