Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 10;21:950. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06841-2

Table 1.

Final Network of Care Configurations for Study Participants

Formal attachment with family physician Perceived relationship with family physician Perceived relationship with specialist(s) Social support system Capacity for self-advocacy and self-care Participant ID
Rostered family physician Optimal family physician involvement Optimal specialist involvement Strong social support system Independent 1, 5, 18
Dependent 22
Weak social support system Independent 19, 21
Dependent 10, 24
Suboptimal specialist involvement Strong social support system Independent
Dependent 6, 17
Weak social support system Independent 13
Dependent 27
Specialist involvement played minimal role Strong social support system Independent
Dependent 16
Weak social support system Independent 11
Dependent
Suboptimal family physician involvement Optimal specialist involvement Strong social support system Independent 15, 28
Dependent 4
Weak social support system Independent 31
Dependent 7, 26
Suboptimal specialist involvement Strong social support system Independent 25
Dependent 8, 14
Weak social support system Independent 2, 23
Dependent
Specialist involvement played minimal role Strong social support system Independent
Dependent
Weak social support system Independent
Dependent
No rostered family physician

Increased reliance

on other services

Optimal specialist Involvement Strong social support system Independent 29
Dependent
Weak social support system Independent 20
Dependent
Suboptimal specialist involvement Strong social support system Independent 3
Dependent
Weak social support system Independent
Dependent
Specialist involvement played minimal role Strong social support system Independent
Dependent
Weak social support system Independent 12, 30
Dependent