Table 2.
Cox proportional hazards regression results for diabetes incidence according to the TG/HDL-C ratio groups
| HRs (95% CIs) | Men | Women | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 (< 1.681) | T2 (1.681– < 2.951) | T3 (≥ 2.951) | T1 (< 1.278) | T2 (1.278– < 2.142) | T3 (≥ 2.142) | |
| Model 1 | 1 | 1.35 (1.23–1.49) | 1.93 (1.76–2.12) | 1 | 1.39 (1.19–1.64) | 2.02 (1.73–2.35) |
| Model 2 | 1 | 1.36 (1.23–1.50) | 1.93 (1.78–2.12) | 1 | 1.40 (1.19–1.65) | 2.04 (1.75–2.37) |
| Model 3 | 1 | 1.22 (1.10–1.34) | 1.57 (1.42–1.73) | 1 | 1.27 (1.08–1.49) | 1.64 (1.41–1.92) |
| Model 4 | 1 | 1.17 (1.06–1.30) | 1.47 (1.34–1.62) | 1 | 1.20 (1.02–1.42) | 1.52 (1.30–1.78) |
Model 1: adjusted for age
Model 2: adjusted for smoking status, alcohol consumption, and physical activity in addition to Model 1
Model 3: adjusted for body mass index, systolic blood pressure, serum total cholesterol, alanine aminotransferase, past hypertension history, family history of diabetes, and monthly household income, in addition to Model 2
Model 4: adjusted for fasting glucose levels, in addition to Model 3