Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 2;10(17):3978. doi: 10.3390/jcm10173978

Table 3.

Sensitivity analyses.

Strategies of Sensitivity Analyses Risk Ratio or Mean Difference
[95% CIs] (%)
Number of Studies
Analysed
Difference of Results Total Number of Subjects Heterogeneity
I 2 p-Value
Pain score (5 min)
Excluding low- or medium-quality
studies
0.81 [−1.84, 3.46] 3 0.13 lower 322 98% <0.00001
Using a fixed-effects model 1.69 [1.41–1.97] 5 0.75 higher 474 96% <0.00001
Pain score (10 min)
Excluding low- or medium-quality
studies
2.45 [2.11–2.79] 1 0.92 higher 152 NA NA
Using a fixed-effects model 2.19 [1.88–2.50] 3 0.66 higher 304 85% 0.0001
Pain score (15 min)
Excluding low- or medium-quality
studies
−0.12 [−1.37–1.14] 3 0.27 lower 354 86% 0.0008
Using a fixed-effects model 0.08 [−0.27–0.44] 5 0.07 lower 506 82% 0.0001
Pain score (20 min)
Excluding low- or medium-quality
studies
0.95 [0.61, 1.29] 1 0.02 higher 152 NA NA
Using a fixed-effects model 0.93 [0.63–1.24] 3 No change 304 0% 0.96
Pain score (25 min)
Using a fixed-effects model 0.24 [−0.71–1.19] 2 No change 152 0% 0.79
Pain score (30 min)
Excluding low- or medium-quality
studies
0.16 [−0.46-0.78] 5 0.19 higher 1608 73% 0.005
Using a fixed-effects model −0.13 [−0.37–0.11] 7 0.10 lower 1760 76% 0.0003
Pain score (60 min)
Excluding low- or medium-quality
studies
−0.85 [−2.24–0.54] 2 0.45 lower 1186 91% 0.001
Using a fixed-effects model −0.73 [−1.14, −0.32] 3 0.33 lower 1234 87% 0.0005
Rescue analgesic requirement
Excluding low- or medium-quality
studies
1.66 [0.57–4.86] 3 No change 322 70% 0.04
Using a fixed-effects model 1.82 [1.06–3.12] 3 0.16 higher 322 70% 0.04

CIs: confidence intervals.