Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 10;11:18081. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95879-7

Table 4.

CAs frequency in AFB2 and resveratrol treated groups.

CAs type Group I Group II Group III Group IV Group V Group VI
Break N.O N.O N.O 53.18 ± 1.42a 40.10 ± 1.38b 26.94 ± 1.16c
Fragment N.O N.O N.O 38.76 ± 1.24a 26.37 ± 1.14b 17.48 ± 0.98c
Acentric N.O N.O N.O 25.14 ± 1.10a 16.53 ± 1.10b 11.40 ± 0.90c
Dicentric N.O N.O N.O 18.74 ± 1.00a 11.63 ± 0.90b 7.35 ± 0.52c
Gap 0.22 ± 0.13d 0.14 ± 0.08d 0.11 ± 0.06d 13.78 ± 0.96a 8.66 ± 0.86b 3.75 ± 0.55c
Ring N.O N.O N.O 9.67 ± 0.88a 5.16 ± 0.68b 1.88 ± 0.48c

Values are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 6). Data shown with different letters(a–d) in the same line are statistically significant (p < 0.05). Group I: control, Group II: 10 mg/kg b.w resveratrol, Group III: 20 mg/kg b.w resveratrol, Group IV: 20 µg/kg b.w AFB2, Group V: 10 mg/kg b.w resveratrol + 20 µg/kg b.w AFB2, Group VI: 20 mg/kg b.w resveratrol + 20 µg/kg b.w AFB2.

N.O not observed.