Table 4.
CAs frequency in AFB2 and resveratrol treated groups.
| CAs type | Group I | Group II | Group III | Group IV | Group V | Group VI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Break | N.O | N.O | N.O | 53.18 ± 1.42a | 40.10 ± 1.38b | 26.94 ± 1.16c |
| Fragment | N.O | N.O | N.O | 38.76 ± 1.24a | 26.37 ± 1.14b | 17.48 ± 0.98c |
| Acentric | N.O | N.O | N.O | 25.14 ± 1.10a | 16.53 ± 1.10b | 11.40 ± 0.90c |
| Dicentric | N.O | N.O | N.O | 18.74 ± 1.00a | 11.63 ± 0.90b | 7.35 ± 0.52c |
| Gap | 0.22 ± 0.13d | 0.14 ± 0.08d | 0.11 ± 0.06d | 13.78 ± 0.96a | 8.66 ± 0.86b | 3.75 ± 0.55c |
| Ring | N.O | N.O | N.O | 9.67 ± 0.88a | 5.16 ± 0.68b | 1.88 ± 0.48c |
Values are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 6). Data shown with different letters(a–d) in the same line are statistically significant (p < 0.05). Group I: control, Group II: 10 mg/kg b.w resveratrol, Group III: 20 mg/kg b.w resveratrol, Group IV: 20 µg/kg b.w AFB2, Group V: 10 mg/kg b.w resveratrol + 20 µg/kg b.w AFB2, Group VI: 20 mg/kg b.w resveratrol + 20 µg/kg b.w AFB2.
N.O not observed.