Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 7;27(33):5610–5621. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i33.5610

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The fit and usefulness evaluation of the nomogram. A: The calibration curve of the nomogram shows a good agreement between the predicted and observed risks in the training cohort; B: The decision curve demonstrates that the nomogram (combined model) obtains more benefit than “treat all”, “treat none”, Rad-score, and the clinical model, when the threshold probability is in the range of 10% to 83%. AUC: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.