Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 7;14:5375–5380. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S327733

Table 3.

Association Between RA and Sepsis

Non-Adjusteda Model 1b Model 2c
HR (95% CIs) P value P for Trend HR (95% CIs) P value P for Trend HR (95% CIs) P value P for Trend
Sepsis 2.9 (2.0, 4.1) <0.001 2.8 (1.9, 4.1) <0.001 3.0 (1.9, 4.6) <0.001
 Seconde
  2.28–3.88 Reference Reference Reference
  3.89–10.25 7.7 (2.3, 26.3) 0.001 6.6 (1.9, 23.2) 0.003 5.8 (1.6, 20.7) 0.007
  Group trend 5.5 (2.0, 15.3) 0.001 4.9 (1.7, 13.8) 0.003 4.3 (1.5, 12.5) 0.007
Sepsis shock 2.8 (1.9, 4.2) <0.001 2.9 (1.9, 4.3) <0.001 3.0 (1.9, 4.8) <0.001
 Seconde
  2.28–3.88 Reference Reference Reference
  3.89–10.25 5.3 (1.5, 18.7) 0.009 4.9 (1.4, 17.7) 0.015 4.2 (1.1, 15.8) 0.033
  Group trend 4.0 (1.4, 11.5) 0.009 3.8 (1.3, 11.0) 0.015 3.3 (1.1, 10.0) 0.033

Notes: aNon-adjusted model adjust for: none; bmodel 1 adjust for: age; gender; cmodel 2 adjust for: age; gender; anion gap; CHF; liver disease.

Abbreviations: RA, red blood cell distribution width–albumin ratio; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.