Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 12;2021(9):CD011612. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011612.pub3

Arabzadeh 2018.

Study characteristics
Methods Randomised, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind, controlled trial
Participants Diagnosis: DSM‐5 major depressive disorder
N: 90 randomised, 81 completed the study
Age: ketamine 50 mg/day group M = 34.31 (SD = 6.73); placebo group M = 33.72 (SD = 8.34)
Sex: ketamine 50 mg/day group 36.6% female; placebo group 40.0% female
Baseline depression severity: ketamine 50 mg/day group HDRS score M = 24.17 (SD = 2.31); placebo group HDRS score M = 24.62 (SD = 3.52)
Interventions All patients received setraline (150 mg a day). As an adjuvant, they recieved either 50 mg/day ketamine or placebo. Patients were followed for 6 weeks.
Ketamine 50 mg/day group (N = 41) ‐ prescribed as 25 mg twice daily.
Placebo group (N = 40)
Concomitant treatment: No, patients were excluded from the study if they had received antidepressant drugs within the previous month.
Outcomes HDRS
Side effects
Response rates (≥ 50% reduction in HDRS score at the termination of the trial)
Remission rates (HDRS scors ≤ 7 at the termination of the trial).
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "Randomization of patients to either ketamine or placebo groups was done by a computerized random number generator (allocation ratio 1/1)."
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "Allocation was concealed using successively numbered, opaque, and sealed envelopes".
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Quote: "The patients, the physician, and the statistician were all blind to allocation. The placebo and ketamine capsules were identical in shape, size, color, texture, and odor." No further details given.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Quote: "The patients, the physician, and the statistician were all blind to allocation. The placebo and ketamine capsules were identical in shape, size, color, texture, and odor." No further details given.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk Exclusion and withdrawal rates at each time point are recorded
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Protocol unavailable
Other bias Low risk No other potential sources of bias identified