Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 12;2021(9):CD011612. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011612.pub3

Carspecken 2018.

Study characteristics
Methods Double‐blinded randomised clinical trial
Participants Veterans scheduled for an index course of ECT for treatment of a major depressive episode associated with treatment resistant major depressive disorder
Diagnosis: DSM‐V major depressive disorder
N: 52
Age:kKetamine group M = 50 (SD = 12); methohexital M = 47 (SD 12)
Sex: ketamine 26% female; Methohexital 11% female
Baseline depression severity: ketamine group PHQ‐9 M = 21.1 (SD = 3.9); Methohexital group PHQ‐9 M = 21.5 (SD = 3.6)
Interventions Intravenous racemic ketamine (1‐2 mg/kg) or methohexital (1‐2 mg/kg), in addition to ketorolac 30 mg for induction of general anesthesia. Participants in the ketamine arm received 1 mg to 2 mg of IV midazolam to mitigate post‐procedural psychedelic effects.
Concomitant treatment: yes. Quote: "Outpatient benzodiazepines were discontinued 48 hours before ECT, whereas all other psychiatric medications were continued during the study."
Outcomes HAM‐D
PHQ‐9
MOCA
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: “"Patient randomization was performed using permuted block randomization to ensure number of subjects assigned to each treatment arm was balanced"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Quote: “"Patient randomization was performed using permuted block randomization to ensure number of subjects assigned to each treatment arm was balanced"
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Quote: “"Subjects and depression score raters were blinded to study drug intervention. Because of feasibility issues, anesthesiologists and psychiatrists were not blinded during ECT sessions."
Effectiveness of blinding not assessed.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Effectiveness of blinding not assessed. Unclear if cognitive measured were blinded as they were completed by psychiatrists who were not blinded.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk Study CONSORT flow chart included.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Study protocol available, outcomes reported as expected.
Other bias Low risk None identified.