Fedgchin 2019.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Phase 3 randomised, double‐blind, active‐controlled multicentre trial | |
Participants |
Diagnosis: DSM‐5 single episode or recurrent major depressive disorder without psychotic features
N: 346 randomised (342 included in analysis) Age: esketamine 56 mg = 46.4 (SD=11.8); esketamine 84 mg = 45.7 (SD = 11.10); Placebo = 46.8 (SD=11.36). Sex: esketamine 56 mg group 70.4% female ; esketamine 84 mg 69.3% female; Placebo = 71.7% female. Baseline depression severity: esketamine 56 mg group MADRS 37.4 (SD = 4.76); esketamine 84 mg group MADRS 37.8 (SD = 5.58); Placebo group MADRS 37.5 (SD = 6.16). |
|
Interventions | Participants were randomised to receive the following intranasal treatments twice weekly for four weeks: Esketamine 56 mg Esketamine 84 mg Placebo nasal spray (with bittering agent to simulate the taste of esketamine solution. Participants also initiated one of the following oral antidepressants to take alongside the randomised treatment: Duloxetine Escitalopram Sertraline Venlafaxine Extended Release (XR) Concomitant treatment: Yes |
|
Outcomes | MADRS CADSS CGADR CGI‐S PHQ‐9 Response (≥50% improvement on MADRS from baseline) Remission (MADRS total score ≤12) |
|
Notes | Authors kindly provided additional data for remission rates according to this review's definition and MADRS mean scores | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Patients were randomised to interventions in a 1:1:1 sequence. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "Randomization was balanced by using randomly permuted blocks and stratified by country and class of oral antidepressant" |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Stated but not tested. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | MADRS assessments were completed by independent, blinded, remote raters, however not tested. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Higher rates of withdrawal and AEs in treatment group |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Trial registered (NCT02417064) outcomes reported as expected. |
Other bias | High risk | Authors are associated with and receive payments from pharmaceutical companies. |