Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 12;2021(9):CD011612. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011612.pub3

Fedgchin 2019.

Study characteristics
Methods Phase 3 randomised, double‐blind, active‐controlled multicentre trial
Participants Diagnosis: DSM‐5 single episode or recurrent major depressive disorder without psychotic features
N: 346 randomised (342 included in analysis)
Age: esketamine 56 mg = 46.4 (SD=11.8); esketamine 84 mg = 45.7 (SD = 11.10); Placebo = 46.8 (SD=11.36).
Sex: esketamine 56 mg group 70.4% female ; esketamine 84 mg 69.3% female; Placebo = 71.7% female.
Baseline depression severity: esketamine 56 mg group MADRS 37.4 (SD = 4.76); esketamine 84 mg group MADRS 37.8 (SD = 5.58); Placebo group MADRS 37.5 (SD = 6.16).
Interventions Participants were randomised to receive the following intranasal treatments twice weekly for four weeks:
Esketamine 56 mg
Esketamine 84 mg
Placebo nasal spray (with bittering agent to simulate the taste of esketamine solution.
Participants also initiated one of the following oral antidepressants to take alongside the randomised treatment:
Duloxetine
Escitalopram
Sertraline
Venlafaxine Extended Release (XR)
Concomitant treatment: Yes
Outcomes MADRS
CADSS
CGADR
CGI‐S
PHQ‐9
Response (≥50% improvement on MADRS from baseline)
Remission (MADRS total score ≤12)
Notes Authors kindly provided additional data for remission rates according to this review's definition and MADRS mean scores
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Patients were randomised to interventions in a 1:1:1 sequence.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "Randomization was balanced by using randomly permuted blocks and stratified by country and class of oral antidepressant"
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Stated but not tested.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk MADRS assessments were completed by independent, blinded, remote raters, however not tested.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes High risk Higher rates of withdrawal and AEs in treatment group
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Trial registered (NCT02417064) outcomes reported as expected.
Other bias High risk Authors are associated with and receive payments from pharmaceutical companies.