Nations 2012 (part II).
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Double‐blind randomised controlled trial | |
Participants |
Diagnosis: DSM‐IV major depressive disorder; score ≥ 9 but ≤ 20 on QIDS‐C
N: 30 Age: Org 26576 100 mg group M = 38.3 (SD = 14.4); Org 26576 400 mg group M = 35.6 (SD = 12.8); placebo group M = 31.1 (SD = 6.5) Sex: Org 26576 100 mg group 40% female; Org 26576 400 mg group 40% female; placebo group 50% female Baseline depression severity: Org 26576 100 mg group QIDS‐C = 15.0 (SD = 2.5); Org 26576 400 mg group QIDS‐C = 15.3 (SD = 1.1); placebo group QIDS‐C = 17.0 (SD = 1.9) |
|
Interventions | 28 days treatment Org 26576 100 mg twice daily (N = 10) Org 26576 400 mg wice daily (N = 10) Placebo (N = 10) Indistinguishable capsules containing placebo, 50 or 100 mg Org 26576 Concomitant treatment: no, patients were taking no other psychotropic medication throughout study |
|
Outcomes | MADRS
CGI‐S
CGI‐I
Response rate (≥ 50% reduction in MADRS scores)
Remission rate (MADRS score ≤ 10) Cognitive functioning and social acuity Neuroendocrine parameters and BDNF EEG Bioanalysis |
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: ''Patients in Part II were randomized to receive Org 26576 100 mg BID, Org 26576 400 mg BID, or placebo in a 1:1:1 ratio'' |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information on allocation concealment provided |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information on blinding provided, other than 'double‐blind' |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information on blinding of outcome assessment provided |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Endpoint data uses LOCF, unsure when dropout occurred |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Protocol unavailable. Data for all time points reported |
Other bias | Low risk | No other potential sources of bias identified |