Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 12;2021(9):CD011612. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011612.pub3

Sanacora 2014 (b).

Study characteristics
Methods Double‐blind randomised controlled trial
Participants Diagnosis: DSM‐IV major depressive disorder; history of poor response (defined as treatment failure on two or more antidepressants after exposure at adequate doses or maximum tolerated doses for ≥ 4 weeks); HRSD‐17 score ≥ 26; CGI‐S score ≥ 5; QIDS‐SR score ≥ 21. However, to improve recruitment criteria reduced to HRSD‐17 score ≥ 20; CGI‐S score ≥ 4; QIDS‐SR score ≥ 16
N: 152
Age: lanicemine 100 mg group M = 45.9 (SD = 10.0); lanicemine 150 mg group M = 46.6 (SD = 9.4); placebo group M = 44.4 (SD = 10.1)
Sex: lanicemine 100 mg group 71% female; lanicemine 150 mg group 61% female; placebo group 61% female
Baseline depression severity: lanicemine 100 mg group MADRS = 33.3 (SD = 5.6); lanicemine 150 mg group MADRS = 34.1 (SD= 5.0); placebo group MADRS = 33.5 (SD = 4.5)
Interventions 3 weeks treatment
Lanicemine (AZD6765) (N = 51) 100 mg, 3 IV infusions per week
Lanicemine (AZD6765) (N = 51) 150 mg, 3 IV infusions per week
Placebo (N = 50) 150 mg, 3 IV infusions per week
Concomitant treatment: Yes, treatment adjunct to ongoing psychotropics that included at least one antidepressant
Outcomes MADRS
Response rate (≥ 50% reduction in MADRS scores)
Remission rate (MADRS score ≤ 10)
HAMA
HRSD
QIDS‐SR
CGI‐S
CGI‐I
Q‐LES‐Q
CADSS
Adverse events
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: ''patients were randomised in a 1:1:1 ratio'' no further details given
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No details given on allocation concealment
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Quote: ''double‐blind'' no further details given
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Quote: ''double‐blind'' no further details given
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk Study reports dropouts
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Protocol unavailable. Data reported matches methods
Other bias Low risk No other potential sources of bias identified