Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 12;2021(9):CD011612. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011612.pub3

Su 2017.

Study characteristics
Methods Double‐blind, randomised, parallel‐group, placebo controlled trial
Participants Diagnosis: DSM‐IV major depressive disorder
N: 71
Age: ketamine 0.5 mg/kg group M = 48.5 (SD = 11.0); ketamine 0.2 mg/kg group M = 45.0 (SD = 12.3); placebo group M = 48.6 (SD = 8.2)
Sex: ketamine 0.5 mg/kg group 87.5% female; ketamine 0.2 mg/kg 73.9% female; placebo group 62.5% female
Baseline depression severity: ketamine 0.5 mg/kg group HAMD‐17 score M = 23.0 (SD = 4.9); ketamine 0.2 mg/kg group HAMD‐17 score M = 23.1 (SD = 4.8); placebo group HAMD‐17 score M = 23.3 (SD = 4.1)
Interventions Patients were randomised to receive a 40‐minute intravenous infusion ketamine (0.2 mg/kg or 0.5 mg/kg) or saline.
Outcomes HAMD‐17
MADRS
BDI
Blood pressure
Heart rate
Digit pulse oximetry
Response (≥ 50% reduction of HAMD‐17 score at any two daily HAMD measures during the period of 24 to 96 hours (days 2 to 5) after infusion.
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk No details on randomisation procedures given
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No details on allocation concealment given
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Stated but not tested
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk No details about blinding of outcome assessment given
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk Consort flow diagram with details of attrition included in figure 1 (page 2843)
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Trial registration available online (UMIN000016985). Outcomes all reported.
Other bias Low risk None identified