Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Sep 15.
Published in final edited form as: Acta Biomater. 2021 Apr 20;132:345–359. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.03.076

Table 1.

A brief summary of the advantages and disadvantages of existing tumor models.

Model Type Advantages Disadvantages
Cell monolayer Uses human source of cancer cells; relatively cheap costs; high throughput Ignores the TME and its effects; cancer cell lines fail to capture phenotypic and genotypic heterogeneity
Mouse models (syngeneic models and genetically engineered mouse models (GEMM)) Recapitulates the TME; allows systemic evaluation of therapies Very limited human relevance; difficult to control selected aspects of the TME; high costs; low throughput
Cell-line xenografts and patient-derived xenografts (PDX) Uses human source of cancer cells; recapitulates the TME (i.e. cancer-stromal interaction) Limited human relevance when studying cancer-immune interactions; high costs; low throughput
Engineered Spheroid Uses human cancer cells; recapitulates selected aspects of the TME; easily controllable; relatively cheap costs; medium throughput Lacks the extracellular architecture; usually lacks parenchyma-stroma organization; lack clonal and genetic heterogeneity
Organoid Uses human cell sources; recapitulates selected aspects of the TME Difficulty with sourcing cells
Organotypic models Uses human source of cells; includes parenchyma and stroma cells Difficulty with sourcing cells and long-term maintenance
Microfluidics Uses human source of cells; able to control local concentrations of soluble factors; includes connectivity Requires expert handling