Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Aug 12;54(7):890–901. doi: 10.1111/apt.16563

Table 1:

Studies evaluating radiomic tools for early diagnosis in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Author CT/MRI N (Train / Valid) Extraction Tool Specific Outcome Measured Statistical Result Clinical Model RQS
Dankerl 2013 CT 372 CADx Differentiation of benign vs. malignant lesion (nodule vs. HCC) AUC 0.75 for textural features
AUC 0.91 for texture + semantic
No 5
Song 2019 CT 84 Omni-Kinetic Differentiation of benign vs. malignant lesion (HCC vs. HH vs. FNH vs. HA) AUC 0.927 for textural features No 9
Stocker 2018 MRI 108 Matlab Differentiation of benign vs. malignant lesion AUC 0.92 arterial phase No 7
Li 2017 MRI T: 112
V:50
Internal Differentiation of HH from HCC AUC 0.73 for GLCM Energy-mean No 10
Oyama 2019 MRI T: 50,50
V: 50
Matlab Differentiation of HH from HCC AUC 0.95 textural features No 9
Wu 2019 MRI 369 Internal Differentiation of HH from HCC AUC 0.89 textural features No 8
Mokrane 2019 CT T: 142
V: 36
Internal Categorize indeterminate nodule as high-risk or low-risk for HCC AUC 0.74 for training cohort
AUC 0.66 for validation cohort
No 10
Asayama 2016 MRI 84 Internal Comparison of individual textural features of non-cancerous parenchyma between those with and without HCC p = 0.0006 for kurtosis
p = 0.0152 for skewness
No 6
Rosenkrantz 2015 MRI 20 Internal Progression of hypovascular nodule to likely HCC on subsequent MRI AUC 0.68 for skewness No 7

CT: computed tomography; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; AUC: area under the curve; HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma; HH: hepatic hemangioma; FNH: focal nodular hyperplasia; HA: hepatic adenoma