Table 3.
Reader | Treatment | Total | Accuracya | Accuracy Improvement (%) | p-valuec | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Improved | Same | Worsened | |||||
1 | SonoVue | 157 | 38 | 100 | 19 | 24.2 | |
Sonazoid | 160 | 29 | 114 | 17 | 18.1 | ||
Difference (95% CIb) | 6.1 ( − 5.0, 17.2) | 0.0013 | |||||
2 | SonoVue | 158 | 23 | 119 | 16 | 14.6 | |
Sonazoid | 163 | 36 | 107 | 20 | 22.1 | ||
Difference (95% CIb) | − 7.5 (− 18.4, 3.5) | < .0001 | |||||
3 | SonoVue | 162 | 27 | 115 | 20 | 16.7 | |
Sonazoid | 165 | 28 | 121 | 16 | 17.0 | ||
Difference (95% CIb) | − 0.3 (− 11.3, 10.7) | < .0001 |
aPost-contrast versus pre-contrast diagnosis when compared with the reference diagnosis
bExact binomial 95% confidence interval
cp-values based on the Farrington-Manning score test for noninferiority