Table 1.
S. cerevisiae mutants identified with significantly decreased or increased CoQ6 content compared with WT.
| ‘Low CoQ’ mutants | |
|---|---|
| ∼Fold decrease in CoQ6vs WT | |
| coq2Δ | not detectable |
| coq3Δ | not detectable |
| coq4Δ | not detectable |
| coq6Δ | not detectable |
| coq8Δ | not detectable |
| coq9Δ | not detectable |
|
hfd1Δ |
2 |
|
‘High CoQ’ mutants | |
| ∼Fold increase in CoQ6 vs WT | |
| mss116Δ | 2 |
| sin3Δ | 2 |
| swa2Δ | 2 |
| trf5Δ | 2 |
| aim26Δ | 2 |
| rri1Δ | 2 |
| trf4Δ | 2 |
| vps54Δ | 2 |
| aim9Δ | 2 |
| drs2Δ | 2.5 |
| atp15Δ | 2.5 |
| pac10Δ | 2.5 |
| ctk3Δ | 2.5 |
| nup60Δ | 3 |
| arc1Δ | 3 |
| sac1Δ | 3 |
| ume6Δ | 3 |
| hof1Δ | 3 |
| bud31Δ | 3 |
| vps20Δ | 3 |
| mrpl4Δ | 4 |
| pho85Δ | 4 |
| rad51Δ | 5 |
| srs2Δ | 5 |
| cho2Δ | 5 |
| rrg7 Δ | 7 |
| cdc50Δ | 8 |
| ric1Δ | 11 |
| ort1 Δ | 11 |
| adk1 Δ | 12 |