Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 30;12:670862. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.670862

TABLE 1.

Summary table of the results of DDI studies performed with the reviewed oral oncolytic drugs.

Drug Effect CYP3A inhibitorsa Effect CYP3A inducersa
Strong Moderate Weak Strong Moderate Weak
Alectinibb 36% ↑ 18.4% ↓
Ceritinib 118.5% ↑ (51–186) 37% ↑ 68.5% ↓ (67–70) 43% ↓
Cobimetinib 572% ↑ 280.5% ↑ (226–335) 3% ↑ 83% ↓ 72% ↓ 13% ↓
Dabrafenib 71% ↑ 34% ↓
• Hydroxy-dabrafenib 82% ↑ 30% ↓
• Desmethyl-dabrafenib 68% ↑ 73% ↑
• Carboxy-dabrafenib 16% ↓
Everolimus 1,430% ↑ 220% ↑ (74–340) 63% ↓
Imatinib 18.5% ↑ (−3.1–40.1) 73.3% ↓ (72.5–74) 37.1% ↓ (30.2–44)
• N-desmethyl-imatinib 16.75% ↑ (−5–38.5) 10.8% ↓ (9.8–11.7) 4.1% ↑
Lenvatinib 14.5% ↑ 6.2% ↑ (−18.2–30.6)
Olaparib 161% ↑ (152–170) 115% ↑ (98–126) 1.5% ↑ (1–2) 79% ↓ (71–87) 57.3% ↓ (53–60) 0%↓
Osimertinib 24.2% ↑ 78.5% ↓ 42% ↓ 0%↓
Palbociclib 86.8% ↑ 40% ↑ (38–42) 0.4% ↑ (0.3–0.4) 85.2% ↓ 35% ↓ (32–38)
Sonidegib 122.8% ↑ (42–253) 98% ↑ (36–179) 76.6% ↓ (66–88) 49% ↓ (29–65)
Sunitinibc 51% ↑ 11% ↑ 46% ↓
a

Reported as percentage of AUC change, if multiple DDI studies were performed the mean AUC change and range are reported.

b

Sum of alectinib and M4.

c

Sum of sunitinib and SU12662, except for the moderate inhibitor.