Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 1;50(3):107–117. doi: 10.1177/1833358320920589

Table 1.

Participant characteristics.a

Physician participant Age Gender Levelb of training Patient charts reviewed Total screen visits Screens per patient Time (mm:ss) Interrater reliabilityc (%)
Average Range (min to max) Total Per patient
1 29 M PGY-3 6 42 7.0 ± 2.5 4–11 31:50 5:18 ± 1:27 78.6
2 28 F PGY-2 12 63 5.3 ± 2.7 1–10 18:50 1:34 ± 1:23 81.0
3 29 F PGY-2 11 71 6.5 ± 2.8 2–11 34:00 3:05 ± 1:35 85.9
4 36 M PGY-2 9 62 6.9 ± 2.1 4–10 32:30 3:37 ± 1:38 75.8
5 28 M PGY-2 5 56 11.2 ± 2.9 9–16 14:00 2:48 ± 1:41 75.0
6 Unknown M PGY-6 9 36 4.0 ± 2.2 1–8 29:00 3:13 ± 1:32 83.3
Cumulative 52 330 6.3 ± 3.1 1–16 2:40:10 3:05 ± 1:49 80.0

a Summary statistics are presented as number/count or mean ± SD.

b Level of training is represented by the number of years of residency and fellowship training since completion of medical school, represented by the postgraduate year (PGY). PGY-1 indicates one postgraduate year (intern); PGY-2 and PGY-3 indicate 2 years and 3 years (residents). Residency training in internal medicine would encompass 3 years (PGY1-3); additional subspecialty training in pulmonary and critical care medicine would encompass 3 subsequent years (PGY4-6, “fellows”).

c Calculated as percentage agreement between two reviewers for screen identification and sequence of screens visited.