Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 9;70:102831. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102831

Table 1.

Summary of search results.

Author/date of publication/journal/country Study type and level of evidence Patient group Outcomes follow up Key results Additional comments
Lederle F A et al.,
2019,
N Eng J Med,
USA [2].
OVER
Randomized control trial- Level 1b Total of 881 patients with AAA
* Group 1 EVAR: 444
*Group 2 OSR: 437
*Follow-up, 14.2 years.
*Median was 9.4 years
*Endpoint is Secondary Ruptures.
*Other outcomes: re-interventions, all cause and aneurysm related mortality
*Group 1 EVAR: 1.6% (7) patients.
*Group 2 OSR:
0.2%% (1) patients.
*95% confidence interval = 0.1–2.6.
*P value = 0.03
*Statistically significant
*Long term
*Multi Center
*Specific skills and device training for the investigators.
Van Schaik et al.,
2017,
JVS,
Netherland [3]
Dream
Randomized controlled trial -level 1b *Total of 351 patients with AAA
*Group 1 EVAR: 173
*Group 2 OSR: 178
* Follow-up was 12 years.
* Median was 10.2 years.
*Endpoint is Secondary Ruptures.
*Other outcomes: re-interventions, all-cause, and aneurysm related mortality
*Group 1 EVAR: 4 (2.3%).
*Group 2 OSR: 0
*P-value <0.05
*Statistically Significant
* Long term follow up
*Multicenter
*Lack of Blinding.
*Old devices used
Rajesh Patel et al.,
2016,
Lancet,
UK [4].
EVAR-1
Randomized control trial- Level 1b *Total of 1252 patients with AAA
*Group 1 EVAR: 626
*Group 2 OSR: 626
* Follow-up was 15·8 years.
*Median was 12.4 years.
*Endpoint is Secondary Ruptures.
*Other outcomes: re-interventions, all-cause, and aneurysm related mortality
*Group 1 EVAR:
31 (5%) Patients.
*Group 2 OSR: 5 (0.8%) Patients.
*95% confidence interval 2.50–16.75
*P-value < 0.05
*Statistically significant
* Long term
*Multi Centre
*Old devices used
* Imaging was of low quality
*Follow up changed from CT to Ultrasound
.
Huang et al.,
2015,
JVS,
USA [5].
Retrospective Cohort -Level 2a *Total of 1116 patients with AAA
*Group 1 OSR: 558
*Group 2 EVAR: 558
*Follow-up, 10 years;
*Median was 7.6 years.
*Endpoint is Secondary Ruptures.
*Other outcomes: re-interventions, all cause and aneurysm related mortality
Group 1 OSR:
0.17% (1) Patients
Group 2 EVAR: 1.4% (8) Patients;
* 95% confidence interval = ;1.01–64.99
*P value = 0.05
*Statistically significant
*Large sample size
*Retrospective
*OSR group are less rigorously followed up.
Kristina A Giles et al.,
2011,
JVS,
USA [6].
Retrospective Cohort -Level 2a Total of
Patients with AAA
*Group 1 EVAR: 22.826
*Group 2 OSR: 22.826
*Follow Up 6 years.
*Median was
*Endpoint is re-interventions and Secondary Ruptures *Group 1 EVAR: 441(19.3%)
RR 0.50
*Group 2 OSR: 76(3.3%)
RR 0.09
*95% Confidence Interval = 2.97–4.50
*P value < 0.001
* Statistically Significant
*Large Sample Size
*Longitudinal design
*Lack of clinical details