Table 1.
Summary of search results.
Author/date of publication/journal/country | Study type and level of evidence | Patient group | Outcomes follow up | Key results | Additional comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lederle F A et al., 2019, N Eng J Med, USA [2]. OVER |
Randomized control trial- Level 1b | Total of 881 patients with AAA * Group 1 EVAR: 444 *Group 2 OSR: 437 *Follow-up, 14.2 years. *Median was 9.4 years |
*Endpoint is Secondary Ruptures. *Other outcomes: re-interventions, all cause and aneurysm related mortality |
*Group 1 EVAR: 1.6% (7) patients. *Group 2 OSR: 0.2%% (1) patients. *95% confidence interval = 0.1–2.6. *P value = 0.03 *Statistically significant |
*Long term *Multi Center *Specific skills and device training for the investigators. |
Van Schaik et al., 2017, JVS, Netherland [3] Dream |
Randomized controlled trial -level 1b | *Total of 351 patients with AAA *Group 1 EVAR: 173 *Group 2 OSR: 178 * Follow-up was 12 years. * Median was 10.2 years. |
*Endpoint is Secondary Ruptures. *Other outcomes: re-interventions, all-cause, and aneurysm related mortality |
*Group 1 EVAR: 4 (2.3%). *Group 2 OSR: 0 *P-value <0.05 *Statistically Significant |
* Long term follow up *Multicenter *Lack of Blinding. *Old devices used |
Rajesh Patel et al., 2016, Lancet, UK [4]. EVAR-1 |
Randomized control trial- Level 1b | *Total of 1252 patients with AAA *Group 1 EVAR: 626 *Group 2 OSR: 626 * Follow-up was 15·8 years. *Median was 12.4 years. |
*Endpoint is Secondary Ruptures. *Other outcomes: re-interventions, all-cause, and aneurysm related mortality |
*Group 1 EVAR: 31 (5%) Patients. *Group 2 OSR: 5 (0.8%) Patients. *95% confidence interval 2.50–16.75 *P-value < 0.05 *Statistically significant |
* Long term *Multi Centre *Old devices used * Imaging was of low quality *Follow up changed from CT to Ultrasound . |
Huang et al., 2015, JVS, USA [5]. |
Retrospective Cohort -Level 2a | *Total of 1116 patients with AAA *Group 1 OSR: 558 *Group 2 EVAR: 558 *Follow-up, 10 years; *Median was 7.6 years. |
*Endpoint is Secondary Ruptures. *Other outcomes: re-interventions, all cause and aneurysm related mortality |
Group 1 OSR: 0.17% (1) Patients Group 2 EVAR: 1.4% (8) Patients; * 95% confidence interval = ;1.01–64.99 *P value = 0.05 *Statistically significant |
*Large sample size *Retrospective *OSR group are less rigorously followed up. |
Kristina A Giles et al., 2011, JVS, USA [6]. |
Retrospective Cohort -Level 2a | Total of Patients with AAA *Group 1 EVAR: 22.826 *Group 2 OSR: 22.826 *Follow Up 6 years. *Median was |
*Endpoint is re-interventions and Secondary Ruptures | *Group 1 EVAR: 441(19.3%) RR 0.50 *Group 2 OSR: 76(3.3%) RR 0.09 *95% Confidence Interval = 2.97–4.50 *P value < 0.001 * Statistically Significant |
*Large Sample Size *Longitudinal design *Lack of clinical details |