TABLE 3.
Association between legume consumption and microbiome on taxa levels in the Shanghai Women's and Men's Health Studies1
| Overall (n = 2302) | Women (n = 1110) | Men (n = 1202) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taxa | Relative abundance,2 median, % | Prevalence, % | β | P FDR 3 | Relative abundance,2 median, % | Prevalence, % | β | P FDR 3 | Relative abundance,2 median, % | Prevalence, % | β | P FDR 3 |
| Legumes | > vs. ≤29.9 g/d | > vs. ≤27.9 g/d | > vs. ≤31.9 g/d | |||||||||
| Phylum Proteobacteria | ||||||||||||
| Class Betaproteobacteria | 2.88 | 99.70 | −0.18 | 0.44 | 2.87 | 99.45 | −0.11 | 1.00 | 2.89 | 99.92 | −0.28 | 0.10* |
| Class Gammaproteobacteria | 1.28 | 100 | 0.30 | 0.005* | 1.31 | 100 | 0.34 | 0.09* | 1.24 | 100 | 0.30 | 0.20 |
| Order unclassified4 | 0.001 | 17.07 | 0.43 | 0.01* | 0.001 | 16.09 | 0.63 | 0.01* | 0.001 | 17.97 | 0.37 | 0.78 |
| Order Enterobacteriales | 0.72 | 99.91 | 0.30 | 0.06* | 0.76 | 100 | 0.33 | 0.56 | 0.70 | 99.83 | 0.31 | 0.78 |
| Family Enterobacteriaceae | ||||||||||||
| Genus unclassified | 0.04 | 96.09 | 0.46 | 0.03* | 0.04 | 96.09 | 0.78 | 0.002* | 0.05 | 96.09 | 0.18 | 1.00 |
| Genus Citrobacter | 0.004 | 71.11 | 0.34 | 0.04* | 0.003 | 70.64 | 0.53 | 0.01* | 0.004 | 71.55 | 0.18 | 1.00 |
| Species unclassified | 0.001 | 61.51 | 0.33 | 0.03* | 0.001 | 62.18 | 0.44 | 0.10* | 0.001 | 60.90 | 0.27 | 1.00 |
| Peanuts | Yes vs. no | Yes vs. no | Yes vs. no | |||||||||
| Phylum Actinobacteria | ||||||||||||
| Order Actinomycetales | 0.01 | 97.87 | 0.19 | 0.08* | 0.01 | 97.82 | 0.24 | 0.23 | 0.01 | 97.92 | 0.10 | 1.00 |
| Phylum Proteobacteria | ||||||||||||
| Class Gammaproteobacteria | 1.28 | 100 | 0.25 | 0.20 | 1.31 | 100 | 0.41 | 0.07* | 1.24 | 100 | 0.10 | 1.00 |
| Order Enterobacteriales | 0.72 | 99.91 | 0.33 | 0.15 | 0.76 | 100 | 0.50 | 0.07* | 0.70 | 99.83 | 0.19 | 1.00 |
| Family Enterobacteriaceae | ||||||||||||
| Genus unclassified | 0.04 | 96.09 | 0.59 | 0.009* | 0.04 | 96.09 | 0.58 | 0.78 | 0.05 | 96.09 | 0.62 | 0.47 |
| Phylum Firmicutes | ||||||||||||
| Family Peptococcaceae 4 | 0.01 | 34.36 | −0.15 | 1.00 | 0.01 | 34.36 | −0.54 | 0.05* | 0.01 | 34.36 | 0.21 | 1.00 |
| Genus unclassified4 | 0.01 | 27.54 | −0.20 | 1.00 | 0.01 | 27.09 | −0.62 | 0.03* | 0.01 | 27.95 | 0.20 | 1.00 |
| Soy foods | > vs. ≤19.9 g/d | > vs. ≤17.5 g/d | > vs. ≤22.0 g/d | |||||||||
| Phylum Proteobacteria | ||||||||||||
| Class Gammaproteobacteria | ||||||||||||
| Order unclassified4 | 0.001 | 17.07 | 0.28 | 0.58 | 0.001 | 16.09 | 0.54 | 0.07* | 0.001 | 17.97 | 0.14 | 1.00 |
| Other beans | > vs. ≤7.2 g/d | > vs. ≤7.8 g/d | > vs. ≤6.7 g/d | |||||||||
| Phylum Bacteroidetes | ||||||||||||
| Species Bacteroides plebeius | 0.01 | 91.05 | 0.14 | 1.00 | 0.01 | 89.18 | 0.81 | 0.08* | 0.02 | 92.76 | -0.49 | 1.00 |
Models were adjusted for time interval between dietary assessment to stool sample collection, age at stool sample collection, sex (only in the combined analyses), education, income, smoking status (for women and combined analyses) or pack-years (for men), alcohol drinking status (for women and combined analyses) or amount (for men), physical activity, BMI, and total energy intake. PFDR, false discovery rate–corrected P value.
Median relative abundance for rare taxa was calculated among carriers.
PFDR < 0.1(*) is considered statistically significant.
Rare taxa: 10% ≤prevalence <50% in the population.