Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 3;32:102811. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102811

Table 2.

Comparison of studies reporting positive/significant and negative/non-significant findings with regard to sex/gender-modulation effects based on neuroimaging modality and study sample.

Studies reporting positive/significant findings (N = 44) Studies reporting negative/non-significant findings (N = 25)
Number of studies (N/Ntotal) by imaging modality (i.e., DTI/DWI/DSI, MEG, MRS, PET, rs-EEG, rs-fMRI, sMRI, task-fMRI, TMS-EEG)
DTI/DWI/DSI (8/11)
MRS(2/4)
rs-fMRI (13/15)
sMRI(15/27)
task-fMRI (6/8)
DTI/DWI/DSI (3/11)
MEG (1/1)
MRS (2/4)
PET(1/1)
rs-EEG (1/1)
rs-fMRI (2/15)
sMRI (12/27)
task-fMRI (2/8)
TMS-EEG (1/1)
Sample size, Ntotal:
Mean ± standard deviation
Median (IQR)
Range
371.68 ± 617.34
171 (111.75)
49–3607
391.32 ± 679.67
126 (3 7 3)
25–3222
Average M:F participant ratio for whole sample (N of male to ONE female, mean ± standard deviation)

1.89 ± 1.28

2.46 ± 1.46
Average M:F participant ratio for autism group (N of male to ONE female, mean ± standard deviation)
2.32 ± 1.82 3.55 ± 2.81
Average M:F participant ratio for control group (N of male to ONE female, mean ± standard deviation)
1.64 ± 1.06 2.11 ± 1.68