Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 5;76(8):1512–1522. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa191

Table 2.

Four Latent Class Model of Cognitive Performance at Age 65 (Wisconsin Longitudinal Study, 2004, N = 3,713)

Latent class
Assigned label Overall low Overall high High fluency High episodic memory
Latent class prevalences .22 .29 .23 .26
Item-response probabilities
 Letter fluency
  Lowest 25% .39 .03 .02 .31
  25%–50% .41 .12 .14 .37
  50%–75% .17 .27 .30 .29
  Highest 25% .03 .58 .54 .03
 Category fluency
  Lowest 25% .52 .07 .09 .29
  25%–50% .24 .12 .15 .27
  50%–75% .20 .29 .37 .33
  Highest 25% .04 .51 .38 .12
 Immediate recall
  Lowest 25% .55 .00 .19 .00
  25%–50% .34 .03 .37 .14
  50%–75% .11 .18 .32 .30
  Highest 25% .00 .79 .12 .57
 Delayed recall
  Lowest 25% .59 .00 .32 .06
  25%–50% .27 .03 .34 .10
  50%–75% .15 .14 .33 .22
  Highest 25% .00 .83 .01 .61