Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 5;76(8):1512–1522. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa191

Table 3.

Four Latent Class Model of Cognitive Performance at Age 72 (Wisconsin Longitudinal Study, 2011, N = 3,713)

Latent class
Assigned label Overall low Older overall high Older high fluency Older high episodic memory
Latent class prevalences .26 .22 .30 .22
Item-response probabilities
 Letter fluency
  Lowest 25% .39 .03 .03 .29
  25%–50% .41 .20 .27 .56
  50%–75% .17 .24 .33 .15
  Highest 25% .03 .44 .37 .00
 Category fluency
  Lowest 25% .52 .10 .16 .36
  25%–50% .24 .13 .20 .26
  50%–75% .20 .45 .40 .32
  Highest 25% .04 .32 .23 .04
 Immediate recall
  Lowest 25% .55 .01 .23 .00
  25%–50% .34 .09 .38 .27
  50%–75% .11 .64 .38 .65
  Highest 25% .00 .27 .01 .08
 Delayed recall
  Lowest 25% .59 .01 .34 .06
  25%–50% .27 .03 .36 .15
  50%–75% .15 .13 .29 .33
  Highest 25% .00 .83 .01 .46