Palmer 1982.
Methods | Allocation: randomised Blinding: double blind Design: parallel study Sample size at entry 20: auranofin 10; placebo 10 Analysis: Completers (50% followup) | |
Participants | Country: New Zealand Patients with active RA Age: mean 52.25 y Disease duration: not reported Females: 75% RF: not reported Concomitant use of steriods: Intra‐articular steroids allowed Concomitant use of DMARDs: none Previous use of DMARDS: none | |
Interventions | Auranofin 6 mg/day vs identical placebo Treatment duration: 6 mo. | |
Outcomes | Tender joints: Ritchie index Swollen joints Pain Patient's assessment score (4 pt scale, 0=nil, 3=excellent) Time to walk 5 M ESR | |
Notes | Quality score: 4 Allocation concealment: adequate Results estimated from graphs by two reviewers and averaged. No SDs reported. Withdrawals & ADRs reported at 2 yrs. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Allocation concealment? | Low risk | A ‐ Adequate |