Skip to main content
. 2000 Apr 24;2000(2):CD002048. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002048

Palmer 1982.

Methods Allocation: randomised 
 Blinding: double blind 
 Design: parallel study 
 Sample size at entry 20: auranofin 10; placebo 10 
 Analysis: Completers (50% followup)
Participants Country: New Zealand 
 Patients with active RA 
 Age: mean 52.25 y 
 Disease duration: not reported 
 Females: 75% 
 RF: not reported 
 Concomitant use of steriods: Intra‐articular steroids allowed 
 Concomitant use of DMARDs: none 
 Previous use of DMARDS: none
Interventions Auranofin 6 mg/day vs identical placebo 
 Treatment duration: 6 mo.
Outcomes Tender joints: Ritchie index 
 Swollen joints 
 Pain 
 Patient's assessment score (4 pt scale, 0=nil, 3=excellent) 
 Time to walk 5 M 
 ESR
Notes Quality score: 4 
 Allocation concealment: adequate 
 Results estimated from graphs by two reviewers and averaged. No SDs reported. Withdrawals & ADRs reported at 2 yrs.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Low risk A ‐ Adequate