Skip to main content
. 2000 Apr 24;2000(2):CD002048. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002048

Prouse 1982.

Methods Allocation: randomised 
 Blinding: double blind first 6 mo. for auranofin & placebo only 
 Design: parallel study, 3 arms (auranofin, GSTM, placebo) 
 Sample size at entry 30: auranofin 10; placebo 10, GSTM 10. 
 Analysis: Completers 100% follow‐up (auranofin 10; placebo 10)
Participants Country: UK 
 Patients with active RA 
 Age: mean auranofin 57.8 y (SD 11.4) 
 Duration of disease: mean auranofin 8.6y (SD 8.1) 
 Females: 85% 
 RH: not reported 
 Concomitant use of steroids: none 
 Concomitant use of other DMARDs: none 
 Previous use of DMARDs: not reported
Interventions Auranofin 6 mg/day or matching placebo or open GSTM IM 50 mg/wk 
 Treatment duration: 6 mo. then reallocated as necessary
Outcomes Articular index (modified Landsbury) 
 Pain 
 ESR
Notes Quality score: 3 
 Allocation concealment: unclear 
 Data for six mo. abstracted from bar graphs 
 SDs imputed from weighted average of CV of other studies. ADRs reported at 12 mo.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear