Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Eat Disord. 2020 Dec 4;54(3):376–387. doi: 10.1002/eat.23421

Table 2.

Body satisfaction, mindful eating, BMI, disordered eating, and muscle-enhancing behaviors by yoga practice (n=1555)

Unadjusted results Adjusted results1
Yoga Practice ES2 p-value Yoga practice ES2 p-value
No (n=1345)
Unadjusted Mean
(SE) or % (n)
Yes (n=210)
Unadjusted Mean
(SE) or % (n)
No (n=1285)
Adjusted Mean
(SE) or % (n)
Yes (n=198)
Adjusted Mean
(SE) or % (n)
Body satisfaction (range: 13-65) 42.2 (0.36) 43.9 (0.89) 0.14 0.070 42.2 (.32) 42.9 (.96) 0.06 0.485
Mindful eating
(range: 4-16)
11.6 (0.06) 12.2 (0.13) 0.29 <0.001 11.7 (.06) 12.1 (.14) 0.19 0.004
BMI (kg/m2) 27.4 (0.20) 25.5 (0.44) −0.27 <0.001 27.4 (.20) 25.6 (.45) −0.26 <.001
Extreme unhealthy weight control behaviors 12.8% (177) 12.4% (25) −0.01 0.902 11.0% (172) 10.4% (24) −0.02 0.804
Less extreme unhealthy weight control behaviors 50.5% (671) 56.8% (118) 0.13 0.100 51.8% (650) 62.3% (112) 0.21 0.011
Binge eating 11.5% (159) 12.6% (28) 0.03 0.629 9.9% (151) 10.7% (27) 0.03 0.704
Steroid use 1.3% (14) 5.2% (10) 0.23 <.001 0.7% (11) 3.8% (9) 0.22 <.001
Protein powder/shakes 26.1% (338) 33.1% (66) 0.15 0.044 25.3% (331) 35.1% (63) 0.21 0.010
1

Adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity/race, socio-economic status, and BMI, except when examining associations with BMI; then estimates are only adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics.

2

ES (effect size) provides a comparable measure of magnitude across outcomes. It is calculated as the standardized mean difference Cohen’s d (for continuous outcomes) and a scaled difference in proportions Cohen’s h (for dichotomous outcomes).