Skip to main content
. 2021 May 18;76(10):e290–e298. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glab144

Table 3.

Associations Between Hearing and Physical Function and Walking Endurance Adjusted for Vestibular Function (n = 526)

Model 2 (adjusted except vestibular function) Model 2 (adjusted) + oVEMP Model 2 (adjusted) + cVEMP
Physical Function Outcome, β Coefficient (95% CI)
eSPPB, score
 Normal hearing, n = 321 Reference Reference Reference
 Mild hearing impairment, n = 119 −0.13 (−0.22, −0.04) −0.13 (−0.22, −0.04) −0.13 (−0.22, −0.04)
 Moderate + hearing impairment, n = 86 −0.18 (−0.29, −0.07) −0.18 (−0.29, −0.07) −0.17 (−0.28, −0.06)
 oVEMP 0.03 (0.15, 0.09)
 cVEMP 0.08 (0.18,0.01)
LDCW, time to walk 400 m, s
 Mild hearing impairment 1.87 (9.35, 13.08) 1.83 (9.38, 13.04) 2.11 (9.08, 13.31)
 Moderate + hearing impairment 20.27 (6.97, 33.56) 19.68 (6.35, 33.01) 19.17 (5.84, 32.50)
 oVEMP 8.13 (5.95, 22.20)
 cVEMP 9.98 (1.29, 21.25)

Notes: cVEMP = cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential; eSPPB = expanded Physical Performance Battery; LDCW = long-distance corridor walk; oVEMP = ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential. Model 2: adjusted for age, sex, race, education, height, weight, diabetes, hypertension, and smoking. Estimates differ from those in Table 2, because of differences in sample size (N = 831 for Table 2 and N = 526 for Table 3 [subsample with vestibular tests]). Bold indicates statistically significant differences compared to normal hearing. β coefficient represent the mean difference in eSPPB scores and LDCW compared to participants with normal hearing.