Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 24;105(2):532–543. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0014

Table 4.

Effects of the CLTS intervention on the 7-day period prevalence

Period prevalence
CLTS Control Relative risk* 95% CI P Relative risk 95% CI P
Overall 0.83 0.60–1.13 0.23 0.78 0.56–1.10 0.16
3 months (June 2016) 11.8% (51/433) 17.2% (72/419) 0.66 0.45–0.98 0.04 0.60 0.39–0.93 0.02
5 months (August 2016) 17.3% (68/394) 17.5% (72/412) 0.98 0.68–1.39 0.89 0.89 0.61–1.29 0.54
9 months (December 2016) 10.5% (44/418) 11.8% (53/451) 0.87 0.52–1.48 0.62 0.87 0.50–1.49 0.61
10 months (January 2017) 7.7% (34/439) 9.9% (42/426) 0.75 0.35–1.60 0.45 0.63 0.28–1.43 0.27

An additional analysis adjusting for more variables is described in Supplemental Table 5.

*

Adjusted for clustering effect, stratification (kebele).

Adjusted for clustering effect, stratification (kebele), baseline prevalence of diarrhea, household head’s religion, income, caregiver’s age and education level, child’s age and sex, and type of water source.