Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 10;23(9):e24081. doi: 10.2196/24081

Table 2.

Task scores, NASA Task Load Index scores, and Likert scale questionnaire scores.

Category 2D CTa group, mean (SD) 2D CT group, median (IQR) 3D holographic group, mean (SD) 3D holographic group, median (IQR) P value
Task score

All participants 74.09 (7.59) 75 (68-80) 91.98 (2.45) 90 (90-95) <.001

Radiologists 82.63 (2.28) 83 (80-85) 93.60 (2.25) 95 (90-95) <.001

Surgeons 74.55 (2.52) 75 (75-75) 91.50 (2.31) 90 (90-95) <.001

Medical students 65.10 (2.61) 65 (65-68) 91.25 (2.18) 90 (90-94) <.001
NASA Task Load Index scores

Mental 47.03 (5.71) 50 (40-50) 20.06 (2.85) 20 (20-20) <.001

Physical 19.75 (1.09) 20 (20-20) 25.08 (0.64) 25 (25-25) <.001

Temporal 63.11 (6.45) 60 (60-70) 40.31 (3.04) 40 (40-40) <.001

Performance 26.17 (6.03) 25 (20-30) 10.08 (0.99) 10 (10-10) <.001

Effort 69.92 (0.99) 70 (70-70) 69.92 (0.99) 70 (70-70) .99

Frustration 29.22 (5.95) 30 (25-35) 14.58 (1.39) 15 (15-15) <.001
Likert-scale questionnaire scores

Effectiveness as teaching tool 1.73 (0.51) 2 (1-2) 4.8 (0.40) 5 (5-5) <.001

Better understanding and communication 1.1 (0.30) 1 (1-1) 4.83 (0.37) 5 (5-5) <.001

Increasing interest 1.8 (0.4) 2 (2-2) 4.9 (0.3) 5 (5-5) <.001

Lowering the learning curve 1.73 (0.51) 2 (1-2) 4.4 (0.49) 4 (4-5) <.001

Better spatial awareness 1.6 (0.49) 2 (1-2) 4.93 (0.25) 5 (5-5) <.001

Learning is easier 2.63 (0.55) 3 (2-3) 4.83 (0.37) 5 (5-5) <.001

aCT: computed tomography.