Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 25;17(10):3413–3420. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1933687

Table 3.

Direct and indirect effects in the proposed model

Direct path Coeff. SE t-value p-value
Knowledge→Attitude .983 .019 49.96 <0.001
Risk perception→Attitude .084 .026 5.474 <0.001
Attitude→Intention .698 .030 23.045 <0.001
Subjective norms→Intention −.035 .019 −1.946 0.052
Perceived behavioral control→Intention .008 .022 .281 0.778
Past behaviora→Intention
.097
.017
4.372
<0.001
Indirect path
Coeff.
SE
ULCI
LLCI
Knowledge→Attitude→Intention .389 .020 .429 .350
Risk perception→Attitude→Intention .011 .005 .023 .0002

Coeff. = coefficient (unstandardized coefficients 0029; SE = standard error; ULCI = upper limit of confidence interval at 95%; LLCI = lower limit of confidence interval at 95%.

The indirect paths were tested using bootstrapping methods (5000 bootstrapping samples).

aPast behavior relating to influenza vaccination.