Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 22;17(10):3603–3612. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1927411

Table 3.

Knowledge of the HPV vaccine among college students, 2018 (N = 5307)

    Vaccination Status
     
Knowledge of the HPV % (n/N*100%) Vaccination group (164) Non-vaccination group −5143 χ2 p OR
Have you ever been heard of HPV vaccine?
  5307 164 5143      
 Yes 2740 (51.6) 133 (81.1) 2607 (50.7) 60.1 <.001 1.0
 No 1859 (35.0) 18 (11.0) 1841 (35.8) 0.2 (0.1–0.3)
 Not sure 708 (13.3) 13 (7.9) 695 (13.5) 0.4 (0.2–0.7)
HPV vaccine can100% protect from getting cervical cancer?
  2740 133 2607 29.9 <.001  
 Yes 67 (2.5) 10 (7.5) 57 (2.2) 1.0
 No 2153 (78.6) 116 (87.2) 2037 (78.2) 0.3 (0.2–0.7)
 Not sure 520 (19.0) 7 (5.3) 513 (19.7) 0.1 (0.0–0.2)
How do you think of the adaptive population for HPV vaccine?
  2740 133 2607      
 Both 1762 (64.3) 112 (84.2) 1650 (63.3) 27.6 <.001 1.0
 Only female 973 (35.5) 20 (15.0) 953 (36.6) 0.3 (0.2–0.5)
 Only male 5 (0.2) 1 (0.8) 4 (0.2) 3.7 (0.4–33.2)
How do you think of the difference between the bivalent vaccine, tetravalent vaccine and nine valent vaccine? (multiple choice)
  2740 133 2607      
 Protective effect 1300 (47.5) 70 (52.6) 1230 (47.2) - - -
 Protected pathogens 1288 (47.0) 91 (68.4) 1197 (45.9)
 Price 1051 (38.4) 53 (39.8) 998 (383)
 Adaptive population 679 (24.8) 30 (22.6) 649 (24.9)
 Adaptive age 673 (24.6) 26 (19.6) 647 (24.8)
 Inoculation process 367 (13.4) 18 (13.5) 349 (13.4)
 Duration of protection 341 (12.5) 11 (8.3) 330 (12.7)
 Side effect 326 (11.9) 11 (8.3) 315 (12.1)
 Manufacturer 140 (5.1) 11 (8.3) 129 (5.0)

“How do you think of the difference between the bivalent vaccine, tetravalent vaccine and nine valent vaccine?” is a multiple choice question, was not included in univariable logistic regression.