Skip to main content
. 2004 Oct 18;2004(4):CD002100. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002100.pub2

Comparison 2. All studies stratified by level of anastomosis.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Clinical anastomotic dehiscence 2 416 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.66 [0.11, 3.94]
1.1 Intra‐peritoneal anastomosis 2 416 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.66 [0.11, 3.94]
2 Mortality 2 416 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.74 [0.30, 1.80]
2.1 Intra‐peritoneal anastomosis 2 416 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.74 [0.30, 1.80]
3 Re‐intervention 2 416 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.71 [0.31, 1.62]
3.1 Intra‐peritoneal anastomosis 2 416 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.71 [0.31, 1.62]
4 Radiological anastomotic dehiscence 1 317 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.34 [0.01, 8.38]
4.1 Intra‐peritoneal anastomosis 1 317 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.34 [0.01, 8.38]
5 Wound infection 2 416 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.01 [0.39, 2.66]
5.1 Intra‐peritoneal anastomosis 2 416 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.01 [0.39, 2.66]