Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 6;28(9):713–723. doi: 10.1038/s41594-021-00637-y

Table 1.

Cryo-EM data collection, refinement and validation statistics

Map 1 global (EMD-13002, PDB 7ONU) Map 2 PRORP focused (EMD-13002, PDB 7ONU)
Data collection and processing
Magnification ×105,000 ×105,000
Voltage (kV) 300 300
Electron exposure (e2) 39.6 39.6
Defocus range (μm) 0.2–2.5 0.2–2.5
Pixel size (Å) 0.834 0.834
Symmetry imposed C1 C1
Initial particle images (no.) 6,150,677 6,150,677
Final particle images (no.) 88,081 88,081
Map resolution (Å) 3.0 3.1
 FSC threshold 0.143 0.143
Map resolution range (Å) 4.7–2.7 4.7–3.0
Map sharpening B factors (Å2) −61.4 −72.3
Refinement
Cryo-EM map used Composite map from map 1 and 2
Initial models used (PDB codes) 1U7T, 5NFJ, 4XGL, 3TUP
Model resolution (Å) 3.0
 FSC threshold 0.5
Model composition
 Nonhydrogen atoms 15,088
 Protein/nucleotide residues 1,764/66
 Ligands ZN:1, MG:1, NAI:4
B factors (Å2), min./max./mean
 Protein 22.58/70.49/36.85
 Nucleotide 38.29/70.72/48.75
 Ligand 33.68/49.62/37.59
R.m.s. deviations
 Bond lengths (Å) 0.004
 Bond angles (°) 0.941
Validation
 MolProbity score 1.30
 Clashscore 3.39
 Rotamer outliers (%) 0.07
Ramachandran plot
 Favored (%) 97.60
 Allowed (%) 2.40
 Disallowed (%) 0.00