Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 31;8:660202. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.660202

TABLE 3.

Differences scanners used for multiplex analysis.

Company Scanner type Image acquisition and scanning instrument Corporate location/notes Resolution Image extraction File type Automatization
Leica Biosystems BF and FL Aperio Versa Illinois, United States 0.468 μm per pixel with ×20 objective. 0.2um at 40x WS TIFF, JPEG Semi-auto and auto
3DHistech BF and FL Pannoramic 250 FLASH III Budapest, Hungary 0.172 and 0.087/0.325 and 0.162 pixels WS --- Auto
Ventana/Roche BF and FL iScan United States, International 24-bit true color WS TIFF/BIF Auto and manual
PerkinElmer MSI (BF and FL) Vectra/Vectra Polaris Boston, United States 10× (1.0 μm/pixel), 20× (0.5 μm/pixel) and 40× (0.25 um/pixel) ROI QPTIFF, IM3, JPEG, single-layer TIFF, BMP, PNG Touchless automation with walk-away image acquisition
Olympus America BF and FL VS110, Nanozoomer (United States) Japan, International 0.32 µm/pixel (20×/NA 0.75) - 0.16 µm/pixel (40×/NA 0.95) WS Compress images and save images in different file formats Auto
Zeiss BF and FL AxioVision MosaiX United States, Germany 5× (2.11 µm/pixel), 10× (1.05 µm/pixel), and 20× (0.53 µm/pixel) WS AVI, BMP, J2K, JP2, JPG, LSM, MOV. PCT, PCX, PNG, PSD, TGA, TIF, WMF Auto/manual

BF: bright field; FL: fluorescence: MALDI: matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization; FOV: field of view; WS: whole section; ROI: region of interest.