NCT02918630.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Design: RCT Recruitment: Clinics Setting: SMI clinics, USA Study start date: October 2016; Study end date: August 2017 |
|
Participants | Total N: 7 N per arm: NRT: 4; EC+NRT 3 Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Inclusion based on specific population characteristic: Yes ‐ SMI (schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, or PTSD) 43% women; mean age 48.3; mean cpd: NR; mean FTND: NR Motivated to quit: Wanted to quit or reduce their cigarette smoking but did not want to quit in the immediate future (this was an exclusion criterion) NB – trial registry states wanted to reduce and protocol states wanted to quit or reduce as inclusion criteria E‐cigarette use at baseline: Not specified |
|
Interventions |
EC: Refillable Both arms received a nicotine patch 21 mg for 4 weeks EC + NRT: 4 weeks: 1) a 3.3 V, 1000 mAh battery; and 2) a 1.5 Ohm, dual‐coil cartomizer (SmokTech; Shenzhen, China). Nicotine concentrations 36 mg/ml. Verbal and written instructions on how to use and maintain the e‐cigarettes at Week 1 visit NRT arm: NRT only |
|
Outcomes | 5 weeks Cessation: n/a but “change in smoking” Adverse events and biomarkers: Breath CO, COPD‐related symptoms, EC side effects (e‐cig side effects questionnaire), AEs, SAEs Other outcomes measured: Urinary cotinine, cpd, tobacco dependence, craving, withdrawal symptoms, desire to quit, confidence to quit, EC dependence, EC use, satisfaction with EC, nicotine dependence, schizophrenia symptoms (brief psychiatric rating scale), cognitive domains associated with schizophrenia (MATRICS consensus cognitive battery), changes in positive symptoms of schizophrenia (scale for the assessment of positive symptoms), changes in negative schizophrenia symptoms (scale for the assessment of negative symptoms), suicide ideation (Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale) |
|
Study funding | Not reported | |
Author declarations | Not reported | |
Notes | New for 2020 update. Information from clinical trials gov [http://clinical trials gov] registry and unpublished protocol; discrepancies between the two in terms of trial methods. Feasibility for future NIH grant application. Intended to recruit 20 participants but only 7 started and completed | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | “double‐blind” but “open‐label” elsewhere, no further info given |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Schizophrenia and COPD outcomes not reported. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Some discrepancies between clinicaltrials record and protocol linked to from record, including when NRT started and inclusion criteria (just schizophrenia or all SMI). Target sample size was 20 but only 7 people recruited |