Ozga‐Hess 2019.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Design: RCT Recruitment: Cigarette smokers were recruited from the community via fliers, online postings, and word of mouth Setting: Morgantown, West Virginia, USA Study start date: Not reported. Study end date: Not reported |
|
Participants | Total N: 60; E‐cigarette plus own brand = 30. Own brand cigarette (control) = 30 38.3% female; mean age completers 35.1 (SD 11) (N = 34) non‐completers 36.8 (SD 12.9) (N = 26); mean cpd completers 16.7 (SD 4.9), non‐completers 19.6 (SD 6.1); mean FTND completers 5.3 (SD 1.8), non‐completers 5.9 (SD 1.9) Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
|
|
Interventions |
EC: Refillable E‐cigarette (18 mg/ml ) plus own brand cigarette. Kanger mini Protank‐II, which is a 1.5 ml Pyrex glass tank with a drip tip and atomizer head coils (KangerTech; China), and a 3.3 V constant output, 900 mAh, eGo‐T battery (Joyetech; Irvine, CA). The liquid (The Vapor Room, Sky Vapors LLC, Frostburg, MD) was labeled as 70% propylene glycol and 30% vegetable glycerin, with a nicotine concentration requested of 18 mg/ml. Participants could choose tobacco, menthol or wild berry flavor and could switch between sessions. Ad libitum use for 4 weeks Own brand cigarette ad libitum use for 4 weeks |
|
Outcomes | Daily for salivary cotinine samples. Daily self‐monitoring device to log e‐cigarette and cigarette use. Collected used cigarette filters Weekly CO breath test Attended the laboratory weekly for assessments (Days 8, 15, 22, and 29). Then completed a follow‐up visit 1‐month post‐intervention self‐reported withdrawal symptoms Reported experience of specific symptoms rated using a visual analog scale with a range from 0 (not at all) to 100 (extremely). e.g. craving, irritability, dry mouth, throat irritation, and cough |
|
Study funding | Financial support provided to MDB and GAD by WVU Senate Grant for Research, and to GAD, MDB, and NAT by Cooperative Agreement Number 1‐U48‐DP‐005004 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to the West Virginia Prevention Research Center. Support provided to NJF and JEOH by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS T32 GM081741). Additional support provided by WV Tobacco Cessation QuitLine | |
Author declarations | Author SGF has consulted for various pharmaceutical companies on matters relating to smoking cessation. All other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "Using a simple randomized design" Comment: not adequately explained |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not adequately described in the paper |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Participants and investigators were not blind |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Biochemical validation |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | 40% retention, but no difference between groups |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All outcomes reported |