Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 13;11(9):e050335. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050335

Table 2.

RMST of blood pressure treatment strategy, stratified by glycaemic treatment strategy

Population 5-year RMST or RMTL (95% CI)
Standard Intensive Difference
Total population n=2371 n=2362
RMST, days, mean (95% CI) 1714 (1700 to 1728) 1716 (1701 to 1730) 1.3 (−18.1 to 20.7)
RMTL due to CVD events 86 (74 to 99) 81 (69 to 94) −4.9 (−22.1 to 12.4)
RMTL due to non-CV death 24 (18 to 31) 28 (21 to 35) 3.6 (−5.7 to 12.9)
Standard glycaemic treatment n=1178 n=1184
RMST, days, mean (95% CI) 1697 (1676 to 1719) 1725 (1707 to 1744) 28.1 (0.4 to 55.9)
RMTL due to CVD events 103 (84 to 123) 77 (61 to 94) −26.0 (−51.0 to 0.9)
RMTL due to non-CV death 24 (15 to 33) 22 (13 to 31) −2.2 (−14.5 to 10.2)
Intensive glycaemic treatment n=1193 n=1178
RMST, days, mean (95% CI) 1731 (1713 to 1749) 1706 (1685 to 1727) −25.2 (−52.3 to 1.9)
RMTL due to CVD events 70 (54 to 85) 85 (67 to 104) 15.8 (−7.9 to 39.5)
RMTL due to non-CV death 25 (16 to 34) 34 (24 to 44) 9.4 (−4.4 to 23.2)

The interaction between blood pressure treatment strategy and glycaemic treatment strategy on RMST was statistically significant (p=0.008).

CVD, cardiovascular disease; RMST, restricted mean survival time; RMTL, restricted mean time lost.