Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 14;22:661. doi: 10.1186/s12864-021-07930-6

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Downstream analysis of the dr_pineal_s2 dataset. a 2D visualization using UMAP of Cell Ranger analyzed clusters. Each point represents a single cell, colored according to cell type. The cells were clustered into 13 distinct types, which were defined according to their unique transcriptomes (Additional file 2). b Expression profile of marker genes according to cluster [7] of (a). Cone- and rod-like PhRs are defined according to their transducin protein subunits (gnat1 and gngt1 in rods vs. gnat2 and gngt2a in cones [25]), as well as their unique opsins (exorh in rod-like [26] and opn1lw1 and parietopsin in cone-like). c 2D visualization using UMAP of kallisto analyzed clusters. Each point represents a single cell, colored according to cell type. The cells were clustered into 14 distinct types, which were defined according to their unique transcriptomes (Additional file 2). d Expression profile of marker genes according to cluster [7] of (c). Two different populations of cone-like PhRs are detected. Both express the cone unique transducin protein-subunits, but differ in the expressed opsin (opn1lw1 in red-cones, and parietopsin in green-cones), demonstrating the bi-chromatic photoreception characteristic of the pineal gland. col14a1b was only detected in the kallisto dataset and is the strongest DE marker within the red-cone cluster (c, d)