Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 31;12:662856. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.662856

Table 5.

Pre-thymectomy TPE comparative efficacy data.

References Nagayasu et al. (10) Sarkar et al. (55) Saeteng et al. (56) d'Empaire et al. (57) Jensen and Bril (58) Alipour-Faz et al. (9)
Treatment Context Pen-operative Peri-operative Peri-operative Peri-operative Peri-operative Peri-operative
Comparison TPE/No TPE TPE/No TPE TPE/No TPE TPE/No TPE TPE/IVIG TPE/IVIG
Study Type Retrospective Retrospective Retrospective Retrospective Retrospective Prospective
Severity Mild to moderate Moderate to severe Mild to moderate Not specified Mild to moderate Not specified
Common serotype AChR+ (75%) AChR+ (100%) Not specified Not specified*** Not specified AChR+ (100%)
# Patients 19/32 10/9 33/53 11/26 9/9 12/12
Response time point 5–7 yrs 1 yrs - - 1st post-op visit -
Response rate MGFA-PIS: 100/81.3% Osserman = 0: 80/44% - - Δ Osserman −1 or better: 78/56% -
Δ Osserman: Δ Osserman:
Response magnitude - −2.7 ± 0.5 / - - −1.00 ± 0.71/ -
−1.7 ± 0.7 −0.78 ± 0.83
Ventilation time (days unless stated otherwise) - 1.3 ± 0.4/4.7 ± 3.2 Immediate extubation rate: 88/94% 1.02 ± 0.4/3.43 ± 0.6 - 0.54 (0.08–9)/0 (0.00*-0.92) **
Hospitalization time 4.7 ± 1.2/ 6.1 ± 4.2/ 3.3 ± 1.2/ 20.3 ± 8.4/
(days) 9.0 ± 3.9 5.2 ± 2.3 2.2 ± 1.9 21.1 ± 5.2
Crisis incidence timing 1 yr 1 yr - - - hosp.
Crisis incidence rate 5.3/28.1% 0/33% - - - 17/0%

Abbreviations: hosp., hospitalization.

No significant difference observed between treatments (p ≥ 0.05) unless noted.

p < 0.05 as reported by original authors or calculated using Fisher exact test or student's t-test, if appropriate.

*

Lower value was updated from 0.08 (as reported in the paper) to 0.00 to include the reported median value (0) within the range.

**

median (range).

***

Data from abstract, full text was not available despite requests to corresponding author and publisher.