Table 6.
References | No. of patients | Relative weight | Response risk difference: TPE % responders—IVIG % responders | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Barth et al. (5) | 81 | 19% | 0.0% (95% Cl: −4.7%, 4.7%) | |
Mandawat et al. (1) | 698 | 34% | 5.1% (95% Cl: 2.8%, 7.4%) | |
Pittayanon et al. (50) | 30 | 3% | 0.0% (95% Cl: −14.9%, 14.9%) | |
Murthy et al. (47) | 23 | 1% | −5.8% (95% Cl: −32.0%, 20.3%) | |
Qureshi et al. (42) | 51 | 4% | −3.2% (95% Cl: −16.0%, 9.5%) | |
Gajdos et al. (41) | 87 | 20% | 0.0% (95% Cl: −4.4%, 4.4%) | |
Guptill et al. (44) | 103 | 19% | 0.0% (95% Cl: −4.7%, 4.7%) | |
Pooled | 1,073 | 1.5% (95% Cl: −1.2%, 4.2%) |