Skip to main content
. 2003 Jan 20;2003(1):CD002278. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002278

James 1967.

Methods Random allocation; double‐blind (A); placebo‐controlled; 23% drop out rate after 3 years (study duration = 3 years). Reasons for drop out described with respective total numbers: moved away, unco‐operative, not present on examination day, disliked toothpaste, staining of teeth, others; no differential group losses.
Participants 803 children analysed at 3 years
 (available at final examination).
 Age range at start: 11‐12 years. Surfaces affected at start: 11 DFS.
 Background exposure to fluoride: data not available for fluoridation status of site.
 Year study began: 1962.
 Location: UK.
Interventions FT versus PL 
 (SnF2 group = 1000 ppm F).
Home use/unsupervised, daily frequency assumed.
 Abrasive system: dicalcium pyrophosphate.
Outcomes 3yDFS increment ‐ (E)
 (CA)cl+(ER)xr.
 Reported at 3 years follow up.
DMFS.
 DFT.
 DMFT.
 postMD‐DFS.
Proportion of children with tooth staining.
Notes Participants randomised (N = 1043).
 Baseline characteristics (age, DFS, DFT, DMFS, DMFT) 'balanced'.
 Clinical (VT) caries assessment by one examiner; diagnostic threshold = CA; state of tooth eruption included = E/U. Radiographic assessment (2 postBW) by one examiner; diagnostic threshold = ER. Diagnostic errors NR.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear
HHS Vulnerability Disclosure