Skip to main content
. 2003 Jan 20;2003(1):CD002278. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002278

Powell 1981.

Methods Stratified random allocation; double‐blind (A); placebo‐controlled; drop‐out rate NR nor obtainable (study duration = 4 years). Reasons for attrition NR; any differential group losses not assessable.
Participants 125 children analysed at 4 years (subjects who developed caries).
 Age range at start: 12‐14 years.
 Surfaces affected at start: 21.4 DMFS (from sample above).
 Background exposure to fluoride: none reported.
 Year study began: 1963.
 Location: Australia.
Interventions FT (pp/Plsol) versus PL(pp/Plsol)** (SnF2 group = 1000 ppm F).
Home use/unsupervised, daily frequency assumed.
 Abrasive system: Ca pyrophosphate.
Outcomes Caries increment data NR (not obtainable).
Progression rate of initial carious lesions in MD surfaces of permanent posterior teeth at annual intervals (for 4 years).
Notes Participants randomised (numbers NR).
 Baseline characteristics (age, gender, DMFS) 'balanced'.
 Radiographic (post BW) enamel caries progression assessment by one examiner; state of tooth eruption included = E.
 High reproducibility of radiographic diagnosis
 (icc = 0.91).
 **Prior prophylaxis with lava pumice followed by professional application of placebo solution performed every six months for 2 years in both relevant groups compared.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear
HHS Vulnerability Disclosure