Skip to main content
. 2003 Jan 20;2003(1):CD002278. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002278

Rule 1984.

Methods Stratified random allocation; double‐blind (A); placebo‐controlled; 24% drop out after 2 years (study duration = 2 years). Reasons for attrition not described; exclusions based on presence in all follow‐up examinations; no differential group losses.
Participants 876 children analysed at 2 years (present for all examinations).
 Age range at start: 9‐12 years (average = 11).
 Surfaces affected at start: 8.6 DMFS.
 Background exposure to fluoride: none reported.
 Year study began: 1977.
 Location: USA.
Interventions FT versus PL 
 (SMFP group = 1000 ppm F).
School use/supervised, daily, for 1 min (appropriate toothpastes also provided for home use).
 Abrasive system: silica zerogel.
Outcomes 2yDFS increment ‐ (E+U) (CA)cl+(ER)xr.
 Reported at 1 and 2 years follow ups.
DFT.
 DMFS.
 DMFT.
 O‐DFS.
 MD‐DFS.
Oral soft tissue lesions.
Notes Participants randomised (N = 1154).
 Baseline characteristics (age, gender, TAR, DMFS, DMFT, DS, DT) 'balanced' (DFS baseline data NR).
 Clinical (VT) caries assessment (FOTI used) by one examiner; diagnostic threshold = CA; state of tooth eruption included = E/U. Radiographic assessment (2 postBW) by one examiner; diagnostic threshold = ER. Reproducibility checks done in 10% sample clinically and radiographically.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear
HHS Vulnerability Disclosure