Table 10.
Comparison of HSMSSA results with other competitors for the speed reducer design problem.
| Algorithm | Optimum variables | Optimum weight | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| x 1 | x 2 | x 3 | x 4 | x 5 | x 6 | x 7 | ||
| HSMSSA | 3.4976 | 0.7 | 17 | 7.3 | 7.8 | 3.35006 | 5.28553 | 2995.4374 |
| SMA | 3.51443 | 0.7 | 17 | 7.32444 | 7.80527 | 3.35235 | 5.28494 | 3002.5941 |
| SSA | 3.49767 | 0.7 | 17 | 7.87797 | 8.09401 | 3.3943 | 5.28574 | 3018.644 |
| AO | 3.5138 | 0.7 | 17 | 7.41461 | 7.81291 | 3.37709 | 5.28457 | 3009.9097 |
| AOA | 3.55989 | 0.7 | 17 | 7.49997 | 8.3 | 3.4623 | 5.28512 | 3061.8731 |
| WOA | 3.49739 | 0.7 | 17 | 7.87039 | 8.0769 | 3.45309 | 5.2854 | 3034.0596 |
| SCA | 3.6 | 0.7 | 17 | 7.3 | 8.3 | 3.37932 | 5.2799 | 3063.9102 |
| MVO | 3.6 | 0.7 | 17 | 8.3 | 8.3 | 3.38276 | 5.36041 | 3111.6609 |